My Very Own Motion, Tra La
by Pamela Jones
April 04 2007Well, obviously, I can't say much about this new SCO filing [ http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/IBM-1018.pdf ] [PDF] at this time. It's all about moi. A bit more here [ http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/IBM-1016.pdf ] and here [ http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/IBM-1017.pdf ].
I can say this: SCO in its wisdom has just guaranteed that the judges in SCO v. IBM and SCO v. Novell will have to read Groklaw. So, welcome Judge Kimball. Welcome, Judge Wells. We've enjoyed very much learning about the law by watching you at work. SCO told you something that isn't true. No one tried to serve me that I knew about. No one informed me of any deposition date. That is true. It doesn't feel so nice to be smeared like this, I can tell you that, and to have to pay a lawyer to deal with this harassment. I view it as such, as a kind of SLAPP suit, a vendetta to pay me back for blowing the whistle, and to shut Groklaw up. SCO wants to put a pin on a map and point to it and say, "Here's PJ." Then someone drops by and shoots me, I suppose. I certainly have nothing to tell them that is relevant to this litigation.
Forsooth, methinks SCOfolk need to get better aligned with truth, justice, and the American way, as the saying goes. But that's the judges' job, so I'll end my comments about this here.
There are 20 some exhibits, some sealed, most not, and as you will see, stories got planted in the media and then presented in court as "proof" once again. I'll tell you more later, when I can.
And so the stupidest lawsuit in the history of the world just got stupider. And
a whole lot meaner.
Here are the exhibits:
12:31 AM EDT
Copyright 2007 http://www.groklaw.net/ - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/