Tech Insider					     Technology and Trends


			      USENET Archives

Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!demon!uknet!festival!dcs.ed.ac.uk!pdc
From: p...@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley)
Subject: Novell's Linux-based OS
Message-ID: <CqEKyp.1An@dcs.ed.ac.uk>
Sender: cn...@dcs.ed.ac.uk (UseNet News Admin)
Organization: Edinburgh University
References: <BURLEY.94May20021958@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> 
<peterd.769636495@merlin.dev.cdx.mot.com> <2rqmgb$a9b@apollo.west.oic.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 1994 09:28:00 GMT
Lines: 10

Can anyone confirm that Novell does *not* plan to release their
Linux-based operating system under the GPL?  Because the rumour I heard
said they did.

And if they do, I doubt they'll have any problems making a profit on it.
If I were a business and Novell said they'd sell me Linux, with support
and printed documentation, for $200, I'd buy it immediately.
  __                          _____
\/ o\  Paul.Crow...@ed.ac.uk  \\ // 42A47697 54144EA4 BACFA9FD C9433347
/\__/ Entomography consultant. \X/  WWW: http://tardis.ed.ac.uk/%7Epdc/

Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!rtp.vnet.net!news1.digex.net!news.intercon.com!
howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!sunic!news.funet.fi!news.csc.fi!news.helsinki.fi!
not-for-mail
From: torva...@cc.Helsinki.FI (Linus Torvalds)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: Novell's Linux-based OS
Date: 31 May 1994 13:29:17 +0300
Organization: University of Helsinki
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <2sf3ht$2ii@klaava.Helsinki.FI>
References: <BURLEY.94May20021958@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> 
<peterd.769636495@merlin.dev.cdx.mot.com> <2rqmgb$a9b@apollo.west.oic.com> 
<CqEKyp.1An@dcs.ed.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: klaava.helsinki.fi

In article <CqEKyp....@dcs.ed.ac.uk>, Paul Crowley <p...@dcs.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>Can anyone confirm that Novell does *not* plan to release their
>Linux-based operating system under the GPL?  Because the rumour I heard
>said they did.

Note: I know no more about it than you do, but this discussion has gone
on for so long that I might as well get my feet wet too.. 

I don't see any way Novell would want to do a non-GPL kernel: they have
enough proprietary value-added stuff (if the reports are true) that
keeping the kernel GPL'd should be no problem at all for them.  The
kernel would be a very miniscule part of the CD-ROM after all. 

I seriously doubt Novell wants to get even a hint of copyright problems
when/if doing the release.  The major reasons I can see for Novell using
linux (apart from the technical ones, of course :-), is (a) make money,
and (b) get a wedge into the PC marketplace with UNIX.  To do both
they'll need to sell a rather large amount of CD's (frankly, I'd think
that (b) is more important to them: they can't expect to make huge
amount of money off a $99 CD-ROM, but they'd probably enjoy making UNIX
PR which then makes money indirectly through larger installations). 

And in order to sell huge amounts of CD-ROMs, the last thing Novell
probably wants is a lot of people running about and wondering if what
they do is legal.  Quite the reverse, I'd assume: by using a free kernel
Novell probably expects to get some goodwill and more room in the PC
rags.. 

Caveat: I obviously have no head for economics at all (why would I still
be a poor student if I had), so anybody taking my views as anything but
wild guesses should probably have their head examined. 

Personal opinion: I may be a blue-eyed optimist, but I think a Novell
distribution would probably be just a good thing.  I'd certainly like to
see looking-glass and windows emulation myself (and I'd expect a
complimentary copy if they ship, so nyaah...  :^). 

		Linus


			        About USENET

USENET (Users’ Network) was a bulletin board shared among many computer
systems around the world. USENET was a logical network, sitting on top
of several physical networks, among them UUCP, BLICN, BERKNET, X.25, and
the ARPANET. Sites on USENET included many universities, private companies
and research organizations. See USENET Archives.

		       SCO Files Lawsuit Against IBM

March 7, 2003 - The SCO Group filed legal action against IBM in the State 
Court of Utah for trade secrets misappropriation, tortious interference, 
unfair competition and breach of contract. The complaint alleges that IBM 
made concentrated efforts to improperly destroy the economic value of 
UNIX, particularly UNIX on Intel, to benefit IBM's Linux services 
business. See SCO v IBM.

The materials and information included in this website may only be used
for purposes such as criticism, review, private study, scholarship, or
research.

Electronic mail:			       WorldWideWeb:
   tech-insider@outlook.com			  http://tech-insider.org/