Tech Insider					     Technology and Trends


			      USENET Archives

From:	Matthias Ettrich <ettr...@troll.no>
Reply-To: kde-licens...@kde.org
To:	kde-licens...@kde.org
Subject: Live and let live
Date:	Sat, 10 Oct 1998 18:43:07 +0200
Old-Return-Path: <ettr...@troll.no>
X-Loop: kde-licens...@alpha.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de

Let me summarize Debian's licensing problem without any pseudo-juridical
nit-picking textual interpretations:

a) "It's ok for Debian to distribute KDE as a source package with an
post-installation script that compiles and installs the stuff for the users."

b) "it's not ok, if Debian compiles the stuff before distribution and ships
both the binary and the source code to make the installation process on the
user's side faster."

Although I have a rather bad opinion of the Debian guys, I just cannot believe
that they are that irrational to claim that there is a significant, even
ethical difference between both approaches. But following the recent
discussion on our mailing lists I almost get the impression that some of them
really believe what they are saying. Naa, that can't be true. The fact that
Debian also removed the KDE libraries (that cleary are not covered by their GPL
interpretation since they are not distributed under the terms of the GPL),
showed their real intention.

In case some Debian developers read this mailing list: Guys, you don't like KDE
since it encourages people to write software for it. Therefore you don't want
to distribute it. That's fine with me. I would never dare to spam your mailing
lists for that reason. So please stop spamming our mailing list.

I still wish you could say this in public (Bruce Perens did it, for example)
without publishing "licensing problems" statements that insult their readers
intelligence. 

Come on,  the LInux world is large enough for both KDE and Debian. We let you
work on your social mission, so please let us fullfil our mission to make Unix
more friendly and powerful for users and application developers.

DISCLAIMER: this is a statement of my own, not of the KDE project. 


Matthias

			        About USENET

USENET (Users’ Network) was a bulletin board shared among many computer
systems around the world. USENET was a logical network, sitting on top
of several physical networks, among them UUCP, BLICN, BERKNET, X.25, and
the ARPANET. Sites on USENET included many universities, private companies
and research organizations. See USENET Archives.

		       SCO Files Lawsuit Against IBM

March 7, 2003 - The SCO Group filed legal action against IBM in the State 
Court of Utah for trade secrets misappropriation, tortious interference, 
unfair competition and breach of contract. The complaint alleges that IBM 
made concentrated efforts to improperly destroy the economic value of 
UNIX, particularly UNIX on Intel, to benefit IBM's Linux services 
business. See SCO vs IBM.

The materials and information included in this website may only be used
for purposes such as criticism, review, private study, scholarship, or
research.

Electronic mail:			       WorldWideWeb:
   tech-insider@outlook.com			  http://tech-insider.org/