OT: Yahoo censortard actually admits destroying SCOXQ.PK message board

saltydogmn

September 7, 2008

(Skip this if you don't care, please.)

Okay, as many of you know, several people have speculated that the identity of our resident mass-deleter of messages and accounts, was none other than Jeffrey Vernon Merkey - and I set up a blog to first track the abuse, and later, once I saw some possible evidence, to give people a better understanding of the man who was very likely the source of the attacks. After setting it up, it was suggested to set up a counter to see where visitors to the site were from; it didn't take long for a visitor from Utah (near Lindon, via Solera Networks) to show up. At the same time, the censortard became maniacally angry, and started frantically star clicking, and filing his now legend false abuse reports, to get the messages deleted, and accounts as well. Classic spastic Merkey, right?

Well, maybe not. So far, this censortard has posted several comments to my blog (exposingyahooabuse.blogspot.com), and the last couple have included a link (under the nickname "Tim Rancid") to his/her own blog; they even posted a retort to me at Yahoo with the same URL, but not-so-cleverly hidden behind a tinyurl link. If you wish to see the censortard blog, use the proxy link I've supplied, or find your own, but make sure your defenses are up; I'd hate to send anyone to Merkey's honeypot!

http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://therealphlaccidphallusophies.blogspot.com/

Now, in reading these lunatic rantings of a clearly deranged individual, you might be tempted to feel sorry for this person. I won't fall for it, though. Seriously, this guy actually *boasts* about his illegal activities, and then has the guts to say that he isn't Merkey... funny, who else would be so obsessed with silencing his (and SCOXQ.PK's) biggest critics, AND is doing the same thing on the NOVL board, AND links to the LinuxHater blog, which some purport to also be Merkey's, but I'll not be wasting any time reading it.

The bottom line? It's either Jeff, or his evil twin, OR someone just as sick and twisted and mentally defective as Jeff.

Anyone have any nominations as to who the censortard really is?

11:23:15 PM


Re: OT: Yahoo censortard actually admits destroying SCOXQ.PK message board

jonathan_sizz

September 8, 2008

May I please express a contrary opinion?

IMO, It's *not* Merkey, and this constant harping on about Merkey is counterproductive. It just gives the Y!Troll a bigger hard-on. The simple fact is, Merkey can't spell or type, even if his life depends on it. The Y!Troll *can*. End of.

May I please offer a piece of advice? Not to you personally, but to everyone still feeding the Y!Troll by fighting it.

Don't be kooks. Leave that place. Let it go. Don't look back. There is no longer anything there worth defending, and the more that people shuttle between that place and this, the more they risk cross-infection. Getting this place messed up would make a LOT of good people VERY angry. Yes, we could cope, we could fight, we could move again, but it would be a massive pain and a massive waste of energy. Please don't be a cause of that.

Thanks for reading.

6:55:49 AM


Re: OT: Yahoo censortard actually admits destroying board (Mr. Sizz)

saltydogmn

September 8, 2008

"May I please express a contrary opinion?"

Um, sure - it's why we're here, right?

"IMO, It's *not* Merkey, and this constant harping on about Merkey is counterproductive. It just gives the Y!Troll a bigger hard-on. The simple fact is, Merkey can't spell or type, even if his life depends on it. The Y!Troll *can*. End of."

Unless you know the identity of who it really is, your opinion is just that - an opinion. You haven't seen the logs - I have. No normal person would dedicate the past 18+ months to destroying a message board - but a schizophrenic lunatic like Jeff easily could - unless you're saying that there's a totally different schizophrenic lunatic responsible for it? Besides, you forget that Merkey already tried - and failed, with spectacular amounts of "failarity" - to sue his critics into silence; I was one of them. I've seen his writing first hand, in my Inbox. He can spell and type just fine, if given the time.

"May I please offer a piece of advice? Not to you personally, but to everyone still feeding the Y!Troll by fighting it."

Sure! I doubt *I'll* bother heeding it, but thanks for the concern.

"Don't be kooks. Leave that place. Let it go. Don't look back. There is no longer anything there worth defending, and the more that people shuttle between that place and this, the more they risk cross-infection. Getting this place messed up would make a LOT of good people VERY angry. Yes, we could cope, we could fight, we could move again, but it would be a massive pain and a massive waste of energy. Please don't be a cause of that."

Where, oh where to begin...

The only "kooks" are the ones destroying the board, and most certainly *not* the people trying to repair the damage. I'm not looking back - I'm looking forward. It is either going to be fixed, or shut down. It's NOT going to be a playground for some clueless black hat script kiddie. As long as Yahoo pretends to offer the service, I'll keep trying in vain to use it as it was originally designed. As for your "shuttle" and "cross-infection" comments, you're starting to sound like the SCOXQ.PK scam artists, trying to pawn off some sort of strange ladder theory, or derivative code bullsh!t... I've got news for you - if you hadn't noticed, this place seems to be set up in a way that would prevent the censortard from accomplishing the same thing as what has been going on at Yahoo. Star-clicking? Totally anonymous at Yahoo - every rec has a name here. Automated and easily abused reporting systems? Yahoo has it, IV doesn't. Actual humans you can talk to? Yahoo has outsourced them to a small planet, somewhere in the vicinity of Betelgeuse; IV has them right here on Earth, with an actual working phone number! No, the troll knows how easy Yahoo is to bork, and how difficult IV is to do the same to. In addition, I don't think he's smart enough to code his way out of a wet paper bag; hacking Yahoo is akin to pwning a Windows 98 box... having the rec system out in the open here ruins any chance of him hiding behind the blatant manipulation.

I get the impression that you feel my defending my rights to post freely on Yahoo, aren't worth as much as your rights to post freely on IV. I sincerely hope I'm mistaken in this regard, because they are, in fact, equal.

'Thanks for reading.'

You're welcome.

8:54:27 AM


Re: OT: Yahoo censortard actually admits destroying board (Mr. Sizz)

jonathan_sizz

September 8, 2008

<< You haven't seen the logs - I have >>

No doubt Mr M has visited your page. He's a known self-googler. It doesn't prove anything more. If you have something more than that, such as the IP of a comment on your page, or IP evidence directly related to Y!SCOX or that other blog, I'd love to hear about it, by PM if you'd prefer.

Out of respect for you I'll refrain from replying to your other robust comments. I, for one, have always really valued your upbeat, forthright posts; they've brightened many a dull day over the past few years and it's great to see the utter failure of Mr M's attempt at persecuting you. Obviously I've got no right to tell you where, when and how to post. You have every right to ignore constructive advice in good faith from your friends - and I will have every right to say "told you so" if my advice turns out to be right. See, eg, #71319.

Anyway, I'm going to bail out of this thread now, for fear of gratifying the lurking somebody.

12:39:29 PM


Source: Investor Village SCO Board [ http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=1911 ]

Copyright 2008