Tech Insider					     Technology and Trends

			      USENET Archives

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!tekecs!orca!curts
From: cu...@orca.UUCP (Curt Stephens)
Newsgroups: net.general
Subject: emacs vs. vi
Message-ID: <99@orca.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 19-Aug-83 16:10:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: orca.99
Posted: Fri Aug 19 16:10:40 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Aug-83 08:56:28 EDT
Lines: 29

I am doing a comparison of the vi screen editor and emacs (running on unix). I
have talked with several people that are familiar with vi and I have talked
with several people that are familiar with emacs. Unfortunately, it appears
that people invariably argue in favor of the editor that they themselves use.
This is especially true of those that know how to use only one editor. 

Thus, I am soliciting help from netland. I would like to hear from people that
are equally familiar with both the vi screen editor and emacs. Let's say, from
people that have used both editors for at least one year.

I realize that there is usage and then there is USAGE. However, I think that 
trying to establish criteria to determine relative levels of expertise would 
quickly bog the whole thing down.

Please send mail directly to me rather than to the net. I will publish a 
summary of all of the feedback that I receive. To make my task a little easier,
please try to limit your replies to about thirty lines. 

                                                         Curt Stephens 

   UUCP:        ...!XXX!tektronix!tekecs!curts 

                (where XXX is one of: aat cbosg chico decvax harpo ihnss
	        lbl-unix ogcvax pur-ee reed ssc-vax ucbvax zehntel)

  CSNET:	tekecs!curts @ tektronix

   ARPA:	tekecs!curts.tektronix @ rand-relay

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!decvax!microsoft!uw-beaver!tektronix!
From: @pesnta.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.general
Subject: editors, vi vs emacs
Message-ID: <803@pesnta.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Oct-83 19:38:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: pesnta.803
Posted: Fri Oct 14 19:38:12 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 22-Oct-83 10:02:04 EDT
Lines: 25

About a month ago, I asked people with more than a year of experience in both 
emacs and vi to let me know which they preferred. I expected to get a few 
responses that presented reasons why their favorite editor was better than the 
other. Instead, I received 49 responses, most of which contained unbiased 
comparisons of the two editors. The votes came in, as follows:

    16 preferred emacs over vi.          

    9 preferred vi over emacs.

    24 suggeted that it didn't matter or that they used both.  

In general, the comments of the people that thought the editors equal made
the most sense to me. There were holes in a few of the arguments that favored
one over the other. That is, a few people suggested that an editor lacked
some function that I have used or read about in the documentation for that

I would like to thank all of the people that responded to my request. Sorry
that I was late in returning the results, but there was more to read than I
expected and I had less time to do it.

                                                        Curt Stephens

			        About USENET

USENET (Users’ Network) was a bulletin board shared among many computer
systems around the world. USENET was a logical network, sitting on top
of several physical networks, among them UUCP, BLICN, BERKNET, X.25, and
the ARPANET. Sites on USENET included many universities, private companies
and research organizations. See USENET Archives.

		       SCO Files Lawsuit Against IBM

March 7, 2003 - The SCO Group filed legal action against IBM in the State 
Court of Utah for trade secrets misappropriation, tortious interference, 
unfair competition and breach of contract. The complaint alleges that IBM 
made concentrated efforts to improperly destroy the economic value of 
UNIX, particularly UNIX on Intel, to benefit IBM's Linux services 
business. See SCO v IBM.

The materials and information included in this website may only be used
for purposes such as criticism, review, private study, scholarship, or

Electronic mail:			       WorldWideWeb: