Tech Insider					     Technology and Trends


			      USENET Archives

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site houem.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!floyd!harpo!
eagle!mhuxl!houxm!houem!dvorak
From: dvo...@houem.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.works
Subject: Mice, Pointing, Cursors and the Universe
Message-ID: <209@houem.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 19-Jan-84 23:55:49 EST
Article-I.D.: houem.209
Posted: Thu Jan 19 23:55:49 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Jan-84 02:27:24 EST
Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 57


I work at Bell Labs, use Unix and its heavily used visual (screen)
editor, "Vi" a lot (at home where I have a HP2621-like terminal).
At work I use my BLIT, a bit-mapped terminal that affords (thanks to
UNIX) one to create, using a mouse, multiple windows on the screen.
Each window is a separate "terminal".  Into one of the windows one can
download (from the host) a mouse-driven screen editor.

Thus I have a choice of a cursor- vs. mouse-driven editor, or BOTH
on the same terminal simultaneously.  MY opinion is:

NO CONTEST.  Gimme a mouse anyday; no need to press anything N times,
or to search for strings (BTW, the BLIT program also allows that).
With a mouse can do exactly what you want, i.e., POINT to that word
and change it.

OK I confess, I did work for Xerox reasearch for 4 years, and got hooked
there.  But when I came to the labs I screamed until they got me something
similar to the Altos and Dandelions of Xerox.

Finally, I'd like to know if Robert Maas has used a mouse with GOOD
software.  If so, I'd say he's entitled to prefer a screen editor.
However, bona fide research has shown that mice beat the keyboard
in text-editing efficiency.   I believe that mice also beat trackballs,
and I know that they beat joysticks.  Of course, people do not always
the most efficient device.

After all, isn't a mouse really a trackball--with the additional
feature of microswitchs for additional functionality?

OK, off my soapbox...wait....one last point...

What you really want is to point to everything ON THE SCREEN with
your fingers.  But you can't do that very well at 12 characters per
inch!!  It's a cinch for a mouse or a trackball.

Of course, what you REALLY want is just to **LOOK** at what you want to
edit, and have the cursor move there, then change the text.  It's
not so far out...you can buy glasses that monitor eye position, and
have a terminal with which you occasionally glance at a corner crosshair
for calibration.  Then the cursor moves wherever you look...

Sure!

A hopeless mouse addict,

Chuck Dvorak (...houem!dvorak) AT&T Bell Labs  Holmdel, NJ

P.S.

In case it didn't come across, I speak as a USER.  While Xerox makes
workstations with mice, and Teletype (an AT&T company) makes the 5620
Dot-Mapped Display, I never would have used them (or loved them) as
a USER if they didn't make life better for me.

			        About USENET

USENET (Users’ Network) was a bulletin board shared among many computer
systems around the world. USENET was a logical network, sitting on top
of several physical networks, among them UUCP, BLICN, BERKNET, X.25, and
the ARPANET. Sites on USENET included many universities, private companies
and research organizations. See USENET Archives.

		       SCO Files Lawsuit Against IBM

March 7, 2003 - The SCO Group filed legal action against IBM in the State 
Court of Utah for trade secrets misappropriation, tortious interference, 
unfair competition and breach of contract. The complaint alleges that IBM 
made concentrated efforts to improperly destroy the economic value of 
UNIX, particularly UNIX on Intel, to benefit IBM's Linux services 
business. See SCO vs IBM.

The materials and information included in this website may only be used
for purposes such as criticism, review, private study, scholarship, or
research.

Electronic mail:			       WorldWideWeb:
   tech-insider@outlook.com			  http://tech-insider.org/