Tech Insider					     Technology and Trends


			      USENET Archives

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-sally.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!hogpc!houti!ariel!vax135!
cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!seismo!ut-sally!jbc
From: j...@ut-sally.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix
Subject: Bell/Berkeley comparisons
Message-ID: <3189@ut-sally.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 24-Aug-84 11:56:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-sally.3189
Posted: Fri Aug 24 11:56:49 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 30-Aug-84 01:45:01 EDT
Organization: MCC, Austin, TX
Lines: 78

To address several issues which continue to arise ....

1. We have presented two papers comparing "Bell UNIX" and "Berkeley UNIX":

	"UNIX System III and 4.1BSD, A Practical Comparison"
	(Winter 1983 USENIX Conference, San Diego)

	"UNIX System V and 4.1C BSD"
	(Summer 1983 USENIX Conference, Toronto)

Contrary to popular rumor, we have presented nothing comparing:

	4.1 BSD and 4.2 BSD
	System V and 4.1 BSD
	System V and 4.2 BSD
	System V Release 2 and anything

The Toronto paper obliquely referenced the state of 4.2 BSD at that
time. It does not necessarily correspond in all details to the actual
system which was distributed some time later.

2. The paper "UNIX System V and 4.1C BSD" is marked

	(c) Copyright 1983 by the Regents of the University of Texas.

solely in order to prevent its sale by anyone other than the USENIX
Association. The paper may be distributed free of cost in any quantity,
by any means and by any entity so long as the whole paper, in one of
the forms originally distributed by us, including the copyright notice,
is distributed. Properly attributed quotations in reviews and other
papers are of course also permitted.

The paper is available in the Proceedings of the Summer 1983 USENIX
Conference, by anonymous FTP as compare.doc from ut-sally.ARPA, and by 
UUCP from ut-sally.UUCP and several other UUCP sites; it was also posted 
to net.sources on USENET.

	To use anonymous ftp, connect with ftp to ut-sally,
	login as anonymous, password guest, and get or retrieve
	compare.doc.  The authors are no longer associated with
	utexas-11 (which is now known as ut-ngp, anyway), but
	principally with ut-sally (which happens to be the
	VAX-11/780 referred to in the paper).

We would rather not have to mail out individual copies to everyone in
the world. Get it from your neighbor if you can.  If there is still
demand we might post to net.sources again.

3. We feel that questions of comparative performance were adequately
treated at the Salt Lake City USENIX Conference, particularly in: 

	"UNIX System V and 4BSD Performance"
	Jeffrey P. Lankford, AT&T Bell Laboratories

	"Measuring and Improving the Performance of 4.2BSD"
	Sam Leffler (Lucasfilm, Ltd),
	Mike Karels, and M. Kirk McKusick (U.C. Berkeley)

It is therefore not our intention at this time to distribute the
results of any such studies which we ourselves may have conducted.

------------------------
Current addresses:

		John B. Chambers	John S. Quarterman

ARPANET/MILNET:	j...@ut-sally.ARPA	j...@ut-sally.ARPA
CSNET:		jbc@ut-sally		jsq@ut-sally
UUCP:		ihnp4!ut-sally!jbc	ihnp4!ut-sally!jsq

USPS:		MCC			Department of Computer Sciences
		9430 Research Blvd.	University of Texas at Austin
		Echelon I, Suite 200	Austin, Texas 78712
		Austin, TX 78759

------------------------
UNIX is a trademark of Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.
VAX is a trademark of Digital Equipment Corporation.

			        About USENET

USENET (Users’ Network) was a bulletin board shared among many computer
systems around the world. USENET was a logical network, sitting on top
of several physical networks, among them UUCP, BLICN, BERKNET, X.25, and
the ARPANET. Sites on USENET included many universities, private companies
and research organizations. See USENET Archives.

		       SCO Files Lawsuit Against IBM

March 7, 2003 - The SCO Group filed legal action against IBM in the State 
Court of Utah for trade secrets misappropriation, tortious interference, 
unfair competition and breach of contract. The complaint alleges that IBM 
made concentrated efforts to improperly destroy the economic value of 
UNIX, particularly UNIX on Intel, to benefit IBM's Linux services 
business. See SCO vs IBM.

The materials and information included in this website may only be used
for purposes such as criticism, review, private study, scholarship, or
research.

Electronic mail:			       WorldWideWeb:
   tech-insider@outlook.com			  http://tech-insider.org/