No.
6.3 <--The Filter--> 1.23.04
Your
regular dose of public-interest Internet news and commentary
from the Berkman Center for
Internet & Society at
H a r v a r d L a w S c h o o l
CONTENTS:
HIGHLIGHTS:
[1]
In the News: WSIS - Whatsis?
[2]
Dispatches: It was 20 years ago today...
[3]
Berkman News: Register Now for ILaw
[4]
Conference Watch
[5]
Bookmarks: Understanding and Understanding
[6]
Quotables: Durr!
[7]
Talk Back
[8]
Subscription Info
[9]
About us
[10]
Not a Copyright
-----------------------------------------
[1] IN THE NEWS
================
* Up(load)s
and Down(load)s
Late
last month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled in favor of
Verizon in its legal battle against the Recording Industry Association of America,
Inc. (RIAA). The decision, handed down on December 19th, blocked the RIAA's
attemtps to force Verizon as an ISP to hand over the names of users whose IP
addresses the RIAA had cited as alleged sharers of copyrighted materials over
P2P networks. In the text of the decision, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
stated that the RIAA could not force Verizon to turn over the information by
siting the Digital Millennium Copyright Act : "It is not the province of the
courts...to rewrite the DMCA in order to make it fit a new and unforeseen internet
architecture, no matter how damaging that developmenthas been to the music industry."
On
January 21, the RIAA filed 532 lawsuits against "John Doe" defendants, identified
only by their IP addresses. With this new angle, the record labels are hoping
to be allowed to subpoena the users' information from ISPs after specific lawsuits
are filed. RIAA president Cary Sherman said, "The message to illegal file sharers
should be as clear as ever - we can and will continue to bring lawsuits
on a regular basis against those who illegally distribute copyrighted music."
On
the Verizon victory:
<http://news.com.com/2009-1027-5130153.html>
Read
the decision--RIAA v. Verizon Internet Services, Inc.:
<http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200312/03-7015a.pdf>
On
the newest lawsuits:
<http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/21/technology/riaa_suits/index.htm>
<http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/20040121_eff_pr.php>
<http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/22/business/media/22music.html>
* Big
Conference, Any Impact?
Participants
and international observers of the largest ever conference on international
Internet development - the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) -
are still trying to evaluate what difference WSIS will have on the future of
information and communication technologies (ICTs). The summit's
official paper trail consists of two documents and a counter-statement, but
according to many, the lasting impact of the 11,000-person summit is more subtle
and varied than these statements reflect. Read more about
the impact of WSIS in this Berkman Briefing:
<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/briefings/WSIS.html>.
In
collaboration with the Berkman Center, the journal of Information Technologies
and International Development (ITID) is producing a special issue dedicated
to WSIS and its aftermath. Read more about the journal and
submission guidelines here:
<http://mitpress.mit.edu/ITID>
The
official WSIS homepage:
<http://www.itu.int/wsis/>
WSIS
declarations:
<http://www.itu.int/wsis/documents/doc_multi-en-1161|1160.asp>
The
Daily Summit's blog of WSIS:
<http://www.dailysummit.net/>
* CASE IN POINT 1.2 [with corrections suggested by alert and well-informed readers]
The
Case in Point is Caldera (SCO) v. IBM, also called the case against open-source.
Update
on litigation: SCO is suing IBM under a number of unfair trade practice and
breach of contract disputes. SCO announced recently that
it also intends to add copyright infringement claims. IBM
has denied most of the claims and asks the court to force SCO to reveal the
portions of the code that are the basis of the allegation.
Since
the last Filter report, SCO notified Linux users of more than 65 files (“ABI
Code”) that it says have been copied into Linux 2.4.21 from SCO’s UNIX code
base. Although these files were covered by the BSDI settlement,
SCO points out that they are part of the “UNIX Derived Files” and the particular
settlement terms that apply to them do not permit distribution without copyright
notice. SCO demands that users remove all ABI Code because
such copying violates the U.S. Copyright Act and because the removal of SCO’s
copyright notice violates the DMCA §1202’s rights management provisions.
See
SCO's letter at
<http://www.sco.com/scosource/abi_files_letter_20031219.pdf>
Meanwhile,
the Open Source Development Labs announced a defense fund to pay legal fees
for litigation threatened by SCO against Linux users, claiming that the fund
has received $3 million in support from supporters such as IBM and Intel.
<http://tinyurl.com/3fylg>.
Our
next discussion question is: Does an open-source license scheme such as the
GPL defeat the purposes of the copyright clause of the United States Constitution
(Article I, Section 8) by forcing those who wish to build on a work to offer
their improvements on a royalty-free basis? Does the answer
differ depending on the type of work that is being distributed?
Under this theory, would technical rights management restrictions that
last beyond the term of copyright protection be equally unconstitutional?
See
SCO’s comments from Darl McBride at
<http://www.newsforge.com/trends/03/12/04/2024240.shtml?tid=85>.
See
the GPL at <http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html - TOC1>.
If
you are interested in commenting on this question, please go to H2O at
<http://h2o.law.harvard.edu/register.do>
and register for the project “SCO-IBM.” Responses will be
reported in the next Filter issue.
Case in Point is an ongoing series of discussions targeting legal issues
in the general sequence in which they are raised by the parties as the actual
case proceeds.
[2] DISPATCHES
==============
January
17th marked the 20th anniversary of the landmark Betamax decision.
When Sony, attacked by Disney and Universal for alleged copyright violation,
emerged victorious, a new era in copyright law was born.
The concept of "time-shifting" - recording a broadcasted work in order to view
it at another time - as fair use would later enter into cases regarding various
new technologies, particularly online download sites (Napster, Grokster, Aimster)
and personal video recorders. Despite the varied results
in these cases and modifications to the relevant law by the DMCA, Sony v. Universal
stands not only important precedent but also legal groundbreaker.
The
majority opinion:
<http://www.virtualrecordings.com/betamax.htm>
Further
readings:
<http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/B/htmlB/betamaxcase/betamaxcase.htm>
<http://zdnet.com.com/2100-11-523817.html?legacy=zdnn>
<http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m3169/34_39/55551109/p1/article.jhtml>
[3] BERKMAN NEWS
================
* AudioBerkman:
Listen to Us
The
Berkman Center is kicking off a new multimedia project: AudioBerkman will offer
a way to listen in to research about the hottest issues related to technology
and cyberlaw. Periodically, we will release a new audio piece
that spotlights a different Internet-related subject and features different
angles on the debate. Check out our first production, and
stay tuned for future pieces by checking the project website.
<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/audio>
* Internet
Law Program 2004: Registration Now Open!
The
Berkman Center for Internet & Society is pleased to offer the Internet Law Program
at Harvard Law School on May 13-15, 2004. This dynamic, innovative three-day
seminar will bring together the leading experts in the field with participants
from all over the world to explore today's most pressing Internet issues and
provoke new ways of thinking about the future of the Internet. The program kicks
off with a distance learning component on April 14 to May 5.
The
outstanding team of educators includes Larry Lessig of Stanford, Yochai Benkler
of Yale, and William Fisher, Charles Nesson and Jonathan Zittrain of Harvard.
On the agenda: recent reforms in intellectual-property systems, privacy versus
security on the Net, the changing shape and role of ICANN, "open" versus "proprietary"
software systems, regulating pornography, jurisdictional problems, cybercrime,
addressing the digital divide, and more.
The
program is intended for a broad audience, and no previous experience with Internet
law is necessary. Past participants have included entrepreneurs, policymakers,
educators, technology professionals, and journalists who write about technology.
American lawyers in some states may be eligible for Continuing Legal Education
(CLE) credit.
For
more information:
<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ilaw>
Online
registration is now open at:
<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ilaw/register>
Questions?
Please contact Robyn Mintz at <mailto:rmintz@cyber.law.harvard.edu>.
* New
Digital Media Website Launched
The
Berkman Center has created a new website for its Digital Media Project, a multi-year
study that began in October 2003. The project, made possible
with the generous sponsorship of the MacArthur Foundation, the Open Society
Institute of the Soros Foundation Network, and Gartner|G2, was initiated to
educate stakeholders, from industry executives to policymakers to the general
public, about how to maximize the potential of digital media technology.
The research has been structured around five scenarios that could become
the primary influences guiding the distribution of music, movies, and other
creative content online. As the project evolves, we will
continue to monitor the digital media debate and expand the five scenarios through
a series of publications and conferences.
<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/media/>
[4] CONFERENCE WATCH
====================
February:
* February
2-3, 2004, Washington, DC--Email Security
<http://www.srinstitute.com/ApplicationFiles/web/WebFrame.cfm?web_id=143>
* February
26-27, 2004, Geneva--Workshop on Internet Governance
<http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/forum/intgov04/index.html>
March:
* March
12-16, 2004, Austin, TX--South by Southwest Interactive Festival
<http://www.sxsw.com/interactive/>
May:
* May
10-14, 2004, Barcelona--INET/IGC 2004 Strengthening the Net: Building an Open
and Trusted Internet
<http://www.isoc.org/inet04/>
* May
13-15, 2004, Cambridge, MA--Internet Law Program
<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ilaw>
* May
26-27, 2004, Zaporozhye, Ukraine--The Second Cybercrime Conference 2004
<http://www.crime-research.org/conferenc.html>
[5] BOOKMARKS
==============
* Jack
Balkin's Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression
for the Information Society
<http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=470842>
* Christopher
Lydon interviews Tim Berners-Lee
<http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/lydon/2004/01/09>
* Understanding
Open Source Software by Red Hat's Mark Webbink, Esq.
<http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20031231092027900>
* On
HR 3261: Do we need stronger database protection?
<http://www.publicknowledge.org/content/legislation/legislation-hr3261>
* Communicast:
Developing a Community-Programmed Webcasting Service by Todd Larson
<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/uploads/308/2004-01.pdf>
[6] QUOTABLES
==============
"[T]here's...evidence
that people haven't stopped swapping music -- they've just stopped admitting
it." -- Hiawatha Bray in The Boston Globe
<http://tinyurl.com/32qqv>
"I
didn't think they would get all their high-priced lawyers to come after me."
-- 17-year-old Mike Rowe, on being sued by Microsoft for his domain name, MikeRoweSoft.com
<http://tinyurl.com/3b2zm>
[7] TALK BACK
================
We
are thinking about how we might adjust the Filter's format and content.
Your ideas and suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Please
send them to filter-editor@cyber.law.harvard.edu
[8] SUBSCRIPTION INFO
======================
Follow
this link to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the list:
<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/filter/subscribe>
[9] ABOUT US
=============
Read
The Filter online at <http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/filter/>.
Who
we are:
<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/filter/about.html>
[10] NOT A COPYRIGHT
=====================
A publication of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School <http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/> You may--and please do--forward or copy this newsletter to friends and colleagues.