From: Andrew Veliath <vel...@frontiernet.net> Subject: to kill DIVX, urge rentals of NORMAL DVDS (even buyers) Date: 1997/09/16 Message-ID: <wkpvqaw1mi.fsf@frontiernet.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 272849296 Sender: guru@THINKPAD X-Complaints-To: ab...@frontiernet.net Organization: Self Newsgroups: alt.video.dvd ...and continue to buy normal DVDs. If what I understand is closer to the truth now, DIVX is competing for the rental DVD market with what I think is deceptive logic. I will iterate this again: comparing the $5 cost to a normal DVD seems cheap, but comparing the $5 cost to renting a normal movie now, or probably a normal DVD is dumber than I can imagine (IMHO)! Not to mention having to have a phone line near my entertainment system (which I may say that out of all the people I know none of which have a phone line situated in a convenient location to their entertainment systems, or at least which won't require some $$ for modification). This seems logical to me: think about it, Circuit City is telling the consumer, IMHO: Pay a $100 premium on a special DVD player, then you pay about 2-3 times as much to rent these special movies for your special DVD player (even over the normal DVD rental, which you really don't even know about), then you pay us to store the movie. If you dispose of it, you pay a penalty and have to buy it again. Of course, that's fine with us since you must pay for your misdeed of throwing out your old rentals. You must pay us to manufacture the disc you would like to rent. Oh yes, we won't tell you, but our new systems is more complicated than renting normal DVDs, but we don't want you to know that. Furthermore, you must pay us later for viewing what you physically own, since we, umm, we really like to hear from you. * * further viewing periods are charged to you less the manufacturing cost and a fudge factor... of course, you could rent a normal DVD for probably less than even this, but we want your money and don't want you to know that... Of course, you could avoid this plague and urge video stores to carry normal rental DVDs now which should hurt acceptance of DIVX, and probably help DVD in the process (that is, if you agree with the above). -- Andrew Veliath <vel...@frontiernet.net> Computer Systems Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute