CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD DoubleTree Hotel Gold Coast Ballroom 2055 Harbor Boulevard Ventura, CA August 14, 1992 8:30 a.m. AGENDA Page 92-13-1 Continuance of the Public Hearing to Consider 001 Amendments to the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Fee Regulation. 92-13-2 Public Hearing to Consider the Adoption of New 002 Specifications for Gasoline Certification Fuel for Motor Vehicles. ITEM NO.: 92-13-2 Public Hearing to Consider New Specifications for Gasoline Certification Fuel for Motor Vehicles. RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends that the Air Resources Board (ARB/Board) approve the proposed amendments to the motor vehicle emission test procedures for light-duty and medium-duty vehicles and heavy duty Otto-cycle vehicles. The amendments would allow the use of certification gasoline based on Phase 2 reformulated gasoline in addition to the existing certification gasolines. Staff also recommends that the existing gasoline certification fuel reflecting 1992 commercial gasoline no longer be an option after 1996. DISCUSSION Existing regulations of the Board establish test procedures which are used for testing motor vehicles to determine if the vehicles comply with the Board's motor vehicle emission standards and accordingly quality for certification. These test procedures include specifications for the certification fuels to be used in motor vehicle testing. Certification fuel specifications have been established for gasoline, diesel fuel, and various other fuels. In 1990 the Board approved regulations modifying the evaporative emission requirements and testing procedures and regulation establishing the low-emission vehicles/clean fuels program. These regulations tightened the motor vehicle evaporative and exhaust standards and, as an interim step, added an optional set of certification specifications for gasoline, reflecting commercial gasoline as of 1992. In November 1991, the Board approved regulations for Phase 2 reformulated gasoline, The regulations include a comprehensive set of specifications affecting eight different gasoline properties and are designed to ensure that in-use gasoline is a significantly cleaner-burning fuel. The approval of Phase 2 reformulated gasoline prompted the need for a new certification fuel. SUMMARY AND IMPACTS The staff is proposing amendments to the motor vehicle emission test procedures which would allow the use of a certification gasoline based on Phase 2 reformulated gasoline in addition to the existing certification gasolines. This new certification gasoline will be referred to as Phase 2 gasoline certification fuel. The new specifications would be allowed in certification testing of 1993 and later model year low-emission vehicles, 1995 model year vehicles which must meet the evaporative emission requirements approved in 1990, and 1996 and later model year conventional gasoline-powered motor vehicles. Beginning with 1996 model year vehicles, the existing gasoline certification fuel reflecting 1992 commercial gasoline would no longer be an option. The specifications for the proposed Phase 2 gasoline certification fuel require the use of a premium grade gasoline blended from typical refinery feedstocks. The specifications fall within a narrow band of the specifications for Phase 2 reformulated gasoline. In addition, the specifications include a limit for multi-substituted alkyl aromatic hydrocarbons, which is based on a high end estimate of the content of these compounds found in Phase 2 reformulated gasoline. The specifications include standards designed to ensure that the fuel is free of contaminants and suitable for use as a motor vehicle fuel. The ARB staff has determined that there would not be any additional significant negative environmental impacts from the production and use of the proposed gasoline certification fuel over the production and use of the production and use of current gasoline certification fuels. The ARB staff has determined that the proposed regulatory action will not create costs or savings to any state agency, local agency or school district. The ARB staff has also determined that adoption of the proposed regulatory action will not have a significant adverse economic impact on small businesses, or on private persons or businesses (other than small businesses) directly affected resulting from the proposed action.