Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu! AI.MIT.EDU!rms From: r...@AI.MIT.EDU Newsgroups: gnu.gcc Subject: The boycott moves forward Message-ID: <8906021909.AA00268@sugar-bombs.ai.mit.edu> Date: 2 Jun 89 19:09:48 GMT Sender: dae...@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 37 I am not considering ending the boycott of Apple, Lotus, and Ashton-Tate. Instead, I am working to expand its effectiveness. Several people on this list have already told me that they are not going to buy from Apple, specifically because of the lawsuit. In other words, they are participating in the boycott. One is in a position to recommend large purchases. I know the boycott is having some effect. I am now helping to set up a new organization, the League for Programming Freedom, whose purpose is specifically to fight look-and-feel copyright through the boycott and other methods. Our demonstration against Lotus has received considerable national press coverage, in which the boycott was described. While the boycott cannot directly prevent a suit, it can raise the cost of a suit to a point where some companies might decide not to sue. It also helps unite public opinion against the principle of look-and-feel copyright, and that can influence both courts and legislators. It may be a shame that some people who previously bought Macintoshes will be somewhat inconvenienced by boycotts by developers. However, this is minor compared with the importance of the main issue. (The Macintosh users who disagree are clearly motivated by different goals.) Some people seem to think that, because I support free software and software sharing, I am obliged to do so in a blind, undiscriminating fashion. You might as well say that anyone who is against "killing people" (i.e., murder) must, for consistency, also be a pacifist and should surrender rather than fight an invading army or a looter. I agree that my stubborn refusal to cooperate with a project, such as porting GCC to AU/X, is a form of hostilities. If I treated innocent people that way, it would be wrong. However, treating aggressors this way is justified and necessary. I am not a pacifist.