From: sa...@anu.edu.au
Subject: SAMBA digest 749
Date: 1995/11/22
Message-ID: < 490m75$5c4@fishgate.efficient.com>
X-Deja-AN: 119936433
sender: dae...@efficient.com
content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
organization: Efficient Email to News Gateway
mime-version: 1.0
reply-to: sa...@anu.edu.au
newsgroups: comp.protocols.smb
SAMBA Digest 749
Topics covered in this issue include:
1) NetBEUI on Linux - victim wanted
by Dan Shearer < itu...@lux.levels.unisa.edu.au>
2) Unsubscribe
by "Eric W. Sink" < e...@rafiki.spyglass.com>
3) Re: OS/2 connection across router?
by "C. R. Oldham" < c...@nca.asu.edu>
4) Re: SAMBA digest 748
by Don Gaffney < gaff...@emba.uvm.edu>
5) browse problem
by k...@pcgate.thch.uni-bonn.de (Knut Schlecht)
6) weird problem with a particular printer
by Carlos Carvalho < car...@snfep1.if.usp.br>
7) Browsing Woes
by Rob A Elkins < elkin...@prism.es.dupont.com>
8) Version of samba for BSDI 2.0
by d...@watson.den.mmc.com (David A Rageth)
9) Re: How to temp Disable a Share ?
by "Andrew.Tridgell" < tri...@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
10) samba under NEXTSTEP 3.3
by Otto A Gygax < o...@rumba.ece.orst.edu>
11) Samba and domain logon validations
by Tim Leamy < tcle...@ucdavis.edu>
12) Re: re-connect from Windows 95
by Tim Villa - ECS < t...@ecel.uwa.edu.au>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 1995 02:04:58 +1030 (GMT+1030)
From: Dan Shearer < itu...@lux.levels.unisa.edu.au>
To: sa...@anu.edu.au
Subject: NetBEUI on Linux - victim wanted
Message-ID: < Pine.SOL.3.91.951121082120.6145K-100000-100000@lux.levels.unisa.edu.au>
A lot of people have asked for NetBEUI functionality with Samba.
Unfortunately it is likely to be fairly platform-specific. A good start
would be to get NetBEUI going under Linux. The way Andrew Tridgell is
restructuring the Samba code makes it easier to support SMB over any
transport that a particular platform provides. Other possibilities
include SMB over IPX.
Alan Cox < iia...@iifeak.swan.ac.uk> is the coordinator of networking for
Linux. Recently he said:
Michael Callahan had a look at netbeui but decided it was quite hard. I
now know how to do netbeui fast, and fairly efficiently should anyone
want to find a victim.
This is a job calling for quite a lot of experience. Any volunteers
should communicate with Alan, not me.
Alan also said:
Win95 uses a bastardised IPX by default. The kernel parts of the IPX
support needed for that are all present even in 1.2.x. As of current
1.3.x releases its on the edge of having enough support to do IPX over
PPP even.
In other words, with Windows 95 it will be possible to connect using a
I-don't-have-to-think protocol (IPX) to Samba, once the transport
dependant stuff has been isolated in the Samba code. This means that the
other I-don't-have-to-think protocol (NetBEUI) isn't needed if all you
want to support is Windows 95.
Still, I think that there are a lot of people who want NetBEUI, and whose
sites have good reasons for not wanting IPX packets on their networks.
--
Dan Shearer email: Dan.Shea...@UniSA.edu.au
Information Technology Unit Phone: +61 8 302 3479
University of South Australia Fax : +61 8 302 3385
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 09:41:07 -6
From: "Eric W. Sink" < e...@rafiki.spyglass.com>
To: sa...@anu.edu.au
Subject: Unsubscribe
Message-ID: <9511221534.AA14...@rafiki.spyglass.com>
unsubscribe e...@spyglass.com
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 08:41:45 -0700 (MST)
From: "C. R. Oldham" < c...@nca.asu.edu>
To: Leslie Mikesell < l...@mcs.com>
Subject: Re: OS/2 connection across router?
Message-ID: < Pine.SUN.3.91.951122084009.22882C-100...@socrates.nca.asu.edu>
On Wed, 22 Nov 1995, Leslie Mikesell wrote:
> > From: "Andrew.Tridgell" < tri...@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
> > Subject: 1.9.15p2 - OS/2 testers wanted
> >
> > So if you use OS/2 to connect to Samba then please try 1.9.15p2 and
> > let me know how it goes (good or bad). If its still not good then
> > please send me detailed instructions on how to reproduce it. I am a
> > total newbie with OS/2 and don't have a clue how to use it :-)
>
> I would like to try this but my unix boxes are on an ethernet connected
> by a router to the OS/2 token ring lan. What is the equivalent of
> LMHOSTS for OS/2 Warp, or can it use DNS to find remote servers?
It can, sometimes. The best thing to do is go into MPTS, Configure your
Lan Adapters, and edit the configuration for Netbios over TCP/IP. Add
the host names and IP addresses to the Names and Broadcasts files. Then
change the driver parameters for Netbios over TCP and change the "Max
Number of Name-IP address pairs" to about 25 or so.
That ought to do it.
--
| Charles R. (C. R.) Oldham | North Central Association |
| c...@nca.asu.edu | Commission on Schools |
| c...@asu.edu | Arizona State University, Box 873011, _ |
| Voice: 602/965-8700 | Tempe, AZ 85287-3011 X_>|
| Fax: 602/965-9423 | #include "disclaimer.h" <> |
|--- G E T W A R P E D --- OS/2 Warp v3 --- Ask any TeamOS/2 member |
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 10:52:12 -0500 (EST)
From: Don Gaffney < gaff...@emba.uvm.edu>
To: sa...@anu.edu.au
Cc: Multiple recipients of list < sa...@anugpo.anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: SAMBA digest 748
Message-ID: < Pine.3.89.9511221041.B18722-0100...@griffin.emba.uvm.edu>
> 6) smbclient can't connect to Win95 box with updated driver
> by "Kenny Wickstrom (x2349)" < ke...@ttd.teradyne.com>
> From: "Kenny Wickstrom (x2349)" < ke...@ttd.teradyne.com>
> To: sa...@anugpo.anu.edu.au
> Subject: smbclient can't connect to Win95 box with updated driver
> Message-ID: < Pine.SUN.3.91.951122010232.3515A-100...@rufus.ttd.teradyne.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using samba 1.9.14 on a Sparc 10 running SunOS 4.1.3. I have had
> good luck connecting both from the Win95 box to samba and vice versa
> until I installed a patch from Microsoft. It seems Microsoft's solution
> to their security hole was to just not allow smbclient to connect. I can
> connect to a non-patched Win95 box using smbclient. I can also connect
> to samba services from a patched Win95 box. I *cannot* connect to a
> shared service on a Win95 box from smbclient.
>
> livingstone 43: smbclient "\\bilbo\c" -U kenny -I 131.101.xx.xx
> Session request failed (131,130) with myname=LIVINGSTONE destname=BILBO
> Called name not present
> Try to connect to another name (instead of BILBO)
> You may find the -I option useful for this
"Share-level access control" works fine for me on a fully patched Win95
June Test Release.
Are you using User-level access control? If so, where do you obtain your
user and group lists?
_____________________________________________________________________
Don Gaffney
Engineering, Mathematics & Business Administration Computer Facility
University of Vermont
237 Votey Building
Burlington, VT 05405
(802) 656-8490
Fax: (802) 656-8802
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 18:33:40 +0100 (MEZ)
From: k...@pcgate.thch.uni-bonn.de (Knut Schlecht)
To: sa...@anu.edu.au
Subject: browse problem
Message-ID: <9511221733.AA57...@pcgate.thch.uni-bonn.de>
>
> SAMBA Digest 747
>
> Topics covered in this issue include:
>
> 1) Solaris 2.4 upgrade
> by la...@shark.mitra.com (Larry Williamson)
> 2) Re: SAMBA digest 745, Solaris 2.4 upgrade
> by msen!ipx1!acs2!hcocozzo (Henry Cocozzoli)
> 3) Re: Domain Password
> by "John Edward Miller" < j...@mystery.milleredp.com>
> 4) Re: Norwegian valid chars and preserving of case
> by Bas Laarhoven
> 5) 1.9.15p2 - OS/2 testers wanted
> by "Andrew.Tridgell" < tri...@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
> 6) more OS/2 patches
> by "Andrew.Tridgell" < tri...@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
> 7) Mixed headers?
> by Jeroen Schipper < Jeroen.Schip...@let.ruu.nl>
> 8) Re: Mixed headers?
> by "Andrew.Tridgell"
> 9) unsubscribe
> by Ralf Reddemann < r...@akron.toppoint.de>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 08:24:46 -0500
> From: la...@shark.mitra.com (Larry Williamson)
> To: dfl...@avprod.gov.coquitlam.bc.ca
> Cc: sa...@anugpo.anu.edu.au
> Subject: Solaris 2.4 upgrade
> Message-ID: <9511201324.AA07...@trout.mitra.com>
>
> It runs faster on 2.4 :-).
>
> Compiles without a hitch. installs just as easily. Runs very well. No
> problems at all here.
>
> I've only ever compiled samba with SunPro C. Never with gcc. I don't
> know if that would make any difference.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Larry
>
> Doug Floer writes:
> > Can anyone comment on the impact on Samba when going from SunOS 4.1.3 to
> > Solaris 2.4?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 95 08:01:09 EST
> From: msen!ipx1!acs2!hcocozzo (Henry Cocozzoli)
> To: msen!anugpo.anu.edu.au!samba
> Subject: Re: SAMBA digest 745, Solaris 2.4 upgrade
> Message-ID: <9511201301.AA20...@acs2.acssdg>
>
> Our current SAMBA version is 1.9.10. Our network consists of:
>
> Sun OS 4.1.3 Systems
> Sun Solaris 2.3 and 2.4
> HP-UX 9.0.1 and 9.0.5
> SGI IRIX 5.2 and 5.3
> AIX 2.3.5
> Windows NT 3.51
> W4WG 3.11
> Windows 95
>
> All work well with samba. Compiled binaries for Solaris 2.3 also work on 2.4.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 10:07:31 +0000
> From: "John Edward Miller" < j...@mystery.milleredp.com>
> To: sa...@anu.edu.au
> Subject: Re: Domain Password
> Message-ID: <199511201704.JAA32...@mystery.milleredp.com>
>
> > Is it possiable to change a NT Domain password from a unix box via SMB.
> > ie capture the SMB packets sent by a WFWG machine during
> > a domain password change and then write a Unix program to
> > do the same.
>
> Somehow I think this prospect would rather frighten the Microsoft
> folks.
>
> One possibility that'd frighten the Unix folks as badly would be to
> replace the getpwnam() and etc. functions with code from Samba that
> authenticates your Unix logins against an NT server. This'd be a
> very viable approach in mostly-Microsoft environments.
>
> BTW, how do the new Advanced Server for Unix products integrate into
> a domain model? Does anyone have any information?
>
> John.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> "It's not possible to belong to a club if one has to arrest the
> members; it's not sociable"
>
> - Marquis de Galliffet
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 23:03:44 +0100 (MET)
> From: Bas Laarhoven < b...@vimec.nl>
> To: sa...@anu.edu.au
> Cc: ku...@zv.fhg.de
> Subject: Re: Norwegian valid chars and preserving of case
> Message-ID: <199511202203.XAA00...@dodo.vimec.nl>
>
> > Date: Mon, 20 Nov 95 11:41:33 MEZ
> > From: Peter Kuehn < ku...@zv.fhg.de>
> > To: sa...@anu.edu.AU
> > Subject: Re: Norwegian valid chars and preserving of case
> > Message-ID: <9511201041.AA06...@sigma2.zv.fhg.de>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > in Germany we have the same problem here. I can't figure out, how to set the
> > option "valid chars". The problem symptoms are the same as described by Cato -
> > one can create files with Umlaut-Chars in it, but you never find them again :-(
> > As useful SAMBA might be, for us in Germany it is rather useless with these
> > flaws. Please Help. Our SAMBA servers are HP-Risc machines and UnixWare 2.02
> > boxes. Samba Version is 1.9.15p1.
> >
> > +-----------------------------------------------------------+
> > | Peter Kuehn *Fraunhofer Gesellschaft* < ku...@zv.fhg.de> |
> > | Tel. +49-89-1205-614 |
> > +-----------------------------------------------------------+
> >
>
> This looks like the same problem I had: Files with special characters
> could be created but never referenced again.
> I send a fix for this to Andrew a couple of days ago, if you're willing
> to do some hacking yourself you can use the appended patch until Andrew
> provides a clean fix.
>
> The main problem is the comparison of the filenames in Samba.
> What I found was that files will be created with the proper case,
> but are referenced by Windows in uppercase only (Who apart from
> MicroSoft could have invented this ?)
> So Samba must do a match ignoring case in the filename.
> That match is done using toupper() calls that seem unaware of
> special characters: the reason of the failure.
>
> My fix assumes the use of Codepage 850 by the windows system,
> so I integrated a mapping of all (?) special characters in the
> code. One should be able to remove these add_dos_char entries from
> the init_char_pair_map function and use the "valid chars" entry
> in the config file to obtain the same result. I didn't test this
> so it may not work.
>
> ---
> Bas. < b...@vimec.nl>
>
>
> --- ../../samba-1.9.15p1/source/util.c Tue Nov 14 16:31:00 1995
> +++ util.c Sat Nov 18 01:32:18 1995
> @@ -2819,8 +2819,10 @@
> if(*str != *p)
> return False;
> } else {
> - if(toupper(*str) != toupper(*p))
> - return False;
> + extern int char_match( int c1, int c2);
> +
> + if (!char_match( *str, *p))
> + return False;
> }
> str++, p++;
> break;
> --- ../../samba-1.9.15p1/source/charset.c Thu Jun 29 10:17:35 1995
> +++ charset.c Sat Nov 18 01:21:40 1995
> @@ -32,6 +32,17 @@
> char *upper_char_map = NULL;
> char *lower_char_map = NULL;
>
> +static unsigned char my_char_map[ 256];
> +typedef unsigned char uchar;
> +
> +#define NR_ITEMS(x) (sizeof(x)/sizeof(*(x)))
> +
> +void add_char_pair(int lower, int upper)
> +{
> + my_char_map[ lower] =
> + my_char_map[ upper] = (uchar) lower ^ (uchar) upper;
> +}
> +
> static void add_dos_char(int lower, int upper)
> {
> DEBUG(6,("Adding chars 0%o 0%o\n",lower,upper));
> @@ -40,7 +51,66 @@
> if (lower && upper) {
> lower_char_map[(char)upper] = (char)lower;
> upper_char_map[(char)lower] = (char)upper;
> + add_char_pair( lower, upper);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/* Case independent character compare,
> + * that will also work for international characters.
> + */
> +int char_match( int c1, int c2)
> +{
> + uchar b = (uchar)c1 ^ (uchar)c2;
> +
> + return (b == 0 || my_char_map[ (uchar)c1] == b);
> +}
> +
> +void init_char_pair_map( void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + /*
> + * my_char_map will contain the (bitwise) difference for all
> + * upper/lower-case character pairs, or zero for single characters.
> + */
> + for (i = 0 ; i < NR_ITEMS( my_char_map) ; ++i) {
> + if (islower( i) || isupper( i)) {
> + if (islower( i)) {
> + add_dos_char(i,toupper(i));
> + }
> + } else {
> + my_char_map[ i] = 0;
> + }
> }
> + /*
> + * Add codepage 850 upper/lower case mapping
> + */
> + add_dos_char(129,154); /* u" */
> + add_dos_char(130,144); /* e' */
> + add_dos_char(131,182); /* a^ */
> + add_dos_char(132,142); /* a" */
> + add_dos_char(133,183); /* a` */
> + add_dos_char(134,143); /* a* */
> + add_dos_char(136,210); /* e^ */
> + add_dos_char(137,211); /* e" */
> + add_dos_char(138,212); /* e` */
> + add_dos_char(139,216); /* i" */
> + add_dos_char(140,215); /* i^ */
> + add_dos_char(145,146); /* ae */
> + add_dos_char(147,226); /* o^ */
> + add_dos_char(148,153); /* o" */
> + add_dos_char(149,227); /* o` */
> + add_dos_char(150,234); /* u^ */
> + add_dos_char(151,235); /* u` */
> + add_dos_char(160,181); /* a' */
> + add_dos_char(161,214); /* i' */
> + add_dos_char(162,224); /* o' */
> + add_dos_char(163,233); /* u' */
> + add_dos_char(164,165); /* n~ */
> + add_dos_char(198,199); /* a~ */
> + add_dos_char(228,229); /* o~ */
> + add_dos_char(231,232); /* bp */
> + add_dos_char(236,237); /* y' */
> }
>
> /****************************************************************************
> @@ -83,6 +153,8 @@
> add_dos_char(183,0); /* A ` (WIN)*/
> add_dos_char(157,0); /* Phi (WIN)*/
> add_dos_char(212,0); /* E` (WIN)*/
> +
> + init_char_pair_map();
> }
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 1995 13:04:26 +1100
> From: "Andrew.Tridgell" < tri...@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
> To: sa...@anugpo.anu.edu.au
> Subject: 1.9.15p2 - OS/2 testers wanted
> Message-ID: <199511210204.NAA10...@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
>
> I've just released 1.9.15p2.
>
> This cleans up a bit more of the master browse stuff.
>
> It also tries to improve things for OS/2 users. I received a copy of
> OS/2 Warp from IBM a few days ago and installed it yesterday. It was
> pretty easy to fix the most obvious problems with Samba and OS/2, but
> I suspect there are more problems lurking in there somewhere.
>
> So if you use OS/2 to connect to Samba then please try 1.9.15p2 and
> let me know how it goes (good or bad). If its still not good then
> please send me detailed instructions on how to reproduce it. I am a
> total newbie with OS/2 and don't have a clue how to use it :-)
>
> Andrew
>
> PS: You could also send a note to Timothy Sipples
> (tsip...@vnet.IBM.COM) and Steve Withers (swith...@vnet.IBM.COM)
> saying thanks for supporting Samba. Steve spent quite a bit of time on
> the phone from New Zealand coaching me through installation with my
> tricky setup.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 1995 17:37:33 +1100
> From: "Andrew.Tridgell" < tri...@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
> To: sa...@anugpo.anu.edu.au
> Subject: more OS/2 patches
> Message-ID: <199511210637.RAA10...@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
>
> Here's another patch to samba 1.9.15p2 to help with OS/2. This one got
> the installation of the devcon CD browser from a remote samba cdrom
> drive working. I suspect it will help with a lot of other stuff too.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> diff -u last-version/source/reply.c source/reply.c
> --- last-version/source/reply.c Tue Nov 21 00:06:48 1995
> +++ source/reply.c Tue Nov 21 15:23:28 1995
> @@ -3194,7 +3194,7 @@
> else
> {
> SIVAL(outbuf,smb_vwv6,sbuf.st_size);
> - SIVAL(outbuf,smb_vwv8,sbuf.st_size);
> + SIVAL(outbuf,smb_vwv8,ROUNDUP(sbuf.st_size,1024));
> }
> SSVAL(outbuf,smb_vwv10, mode);
>
> diff -u last-version/source/smb.h source/smb.h
> --- last-version/source/smb.h Tue Nov 14 21:55:41 1995
> +++ source/smb.h Tue Nov 21 15:23:50 1995
> @@ -978,5 +978,7 @@
> /* this is how errors are generated */
> #define UNIXERROR(defclass,deferror) unix_error_packet(inbuf,outbuf,defclass,deferror,__LINE__)
>
> +#define ROUNDUP(x,g) (((x)+((g)-1))&~((g)-1))
> +
> #endif
> /* _SMB_H */
>
> diff -u last-version/source/trans2.c source/trans2.c
> --- last-version/source/trans2.c Mon Nov 20 19:08:34 1995
> +++ source/trans2.c Tue Nov 21 17:17:50 1995
> @@ -31,8 +31,6 @@
> extern files_struct Files[];
> extern BOOL case_sensitive;
>
> -#define ROUNDUP(x,g) (((x)+((g)-1))&~((g)-1))
> -
> /****************************************************************************
> Send the required number of replies back.
> We assume all fields other than the data fields are
> @@ -1062,14 +1060,18 @@
> break;
>
> case 3:
> - case 4:
> - data_size = (info_level==3?24:28);
> + data_size = 24;
> put_dos_date2(pdata,0,sbuf.st_ctime);
> put_dos_date2(pdata,4,sbuf.st_atime);
> put_dos_date2(pdata,8,sbuf.st_mtime);
> SIVAL(pdata,12,size);
> SIVAL(pdata,16,ROUNDUP(size,1024));
> SIVAL(pdata,20,mode);
> + break;
> +
> + case 4:
> + data_size = 4;
> + SIVAL(pdata,0,data_size);
> break;
>
> case 6:
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 1995 09:59:51 +0100 (MET)
> From: Jeroen Schipper < Jeroen.Schip...@let.ruu.nl>
> To: The Samba Mailinglist < sa...@anu.edu.au>
> Subject: Mixed headers?
> Message-ID: < Pine.ULT.3.91.951121095416.17069B-100...@ruulch.let.ruu.nl>
>
>
> I get the following messages in my 1.9.15p1 log:
>
> "Your readdir() is broken. You have somehow mixed SYSV and BSD headers and
> libraries"
>
> It's on a Solaris2.3 system, I use the Sun C compiler (cc: SC3.0.1 13 Jul
> 1994). I'm not much of a C expert - any suggestions on what to do? Samba
> does seem to work normally, except we're having a problem with MS-Access
> (slow or no access to SMB drives).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeroen
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 1995 20:38:25 +1100
> From: "Andrew.Tridgell" < tri...@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
> To: Jeroen.Schip...@let.ruu.nl
> Subject: Re: Mixed headers?
> Message-ID: <199511210938.UAA11...@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
>
> > "Your readdir() is broken. You have somehow mixed SYSV and BSD headers and
> > libraries"
> >
> > It's on a Solaris2.3 system, I use the Sun C compiler (cc: SC3.0.1 13 Jul
> > 1994). I'm not much of a C expert - any suggestions on what to do? Samba
> > does seem to work normally, except we're having a problem with MS-Access
> > (slow or no access to SMB drives).
>
> The error almost certainly isn't related to the problem with
> MS-access.
>
> It means your compiler/library/header setup is broken. Samba
> automatically detects this at run time (it can tell due to really
> weird filenames showing up in readdir() output). Samba will operate
> correctly, but its a good idea to get it fixed as most other programs
> won't be so adaptable. If you compile something that calls readdir()
> then it will probably fail to work.
>
> I have no ideas on the MS-access speed problem without further info.
>
> Andrew
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 22:34:59 +-100
> From: Ralf Reddemann < r...@akron.toppoint.de>
> To: "'sa...@anugpo.anu.edu.au'" < sa...@anugpo.anu.edu.au>
> Subject: unsubscribe
> Message-ID: <01BAB798.6D967980@detten>
>
>
> ------ =_NextPart_000_01BAB798.6D9FA140
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> unsubscribe r...@akron.toppoint.de
>
> ------ =_NextPart_000_01BAB798.6D9FA140
> Content-Type: application/ms-tnef
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
>
> eJ8+IgAVAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5AQAAAAAAADoAAENgAQAAgAAAAIAAgABBJAG
> AIwBAAABAAAADQAAAAMAADACAAAACwAPDgAAAAACAf8PAQAAAE0AAAAAAAAAgSsfpL6jEBmdbgDd
> AQ9UAgAAAABzYW1iYUBhbnVncG8uYW51LmVkdS5hdQBTTVRQAHNhbWJhQGFudWdwby5hbnUuZWR1
> LmF1AAAAAB4AAjABAAAABQAAAFNNVFAAAAAAHgADMAEAAAAYAAAAc2FtYmFAYW51Z3BvLmFudS5l
> ZHUuYXUAAwAVDAEAAAACAfkPAQAAAE0AAAAAAAAAgSsfpL6jEBmdbgDdAQ9UAgAAAABzYW1iYUBh
> bnVncG8uYW51LmVkdS5hdQBTTVRQAHNhbWJhQGFudWdwby5hbnUuZWR1LmF1AAAAAAMA/g8GAAAA
> HgABMAEAAAAaAAAAJ3NhbWJhQGFudWdwby5hbnUuZWR1LmF1JwAAAAIBCzABAAAAHQAAAFNNVFA6
> U0FNQkFAQU5VR1BPLkFOVS5FRFUuQVUAAAAAAwAAOQAAAAALAEA6AQAAAAIB9g8BAAAABAAAAAAA
> AAJLUgEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNyb3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQSAAQAMAAAAdW5zdWJzY3Jp
> YmUApQQBBYADAA4AAADLBwsAFAAWACIAOwABAGUBASCAAwAOAAAAywcLABQAFgAiAAwAAQA2AQEJ
> gAEAIQAAADZBRjJFMzRCNjYyM0NGMTFBQzFEMDA2MDhDNzJFNURCADwHAQOQBgC4AQAAEgAAAAsA
> IwAAAAAAAwAmAAAAAAALACkAAAAAAAMANgAAAAAAQAA5ACAKxwqQt7oBHgBwAAEAAAAMAAAAdW5z
> dWJzY3JpYmUAAgFxAAEAAAAWAAAAAbq3kAq2S+PyayNmEc+sHQBgjHLl2wAAHgAeDAEAAAAFAAAA
> U01UUAAAAAAeAB8MAQAAABUAAAByckBha3Jvbi50b3Bwb2ludC5kZQAAAAADAAYQsiRBhgMABxAd
> AAAAHgAIEAEAAAAeAAAAVU5TVUJTQ1JJQkVSUkBBS1JPTlRPUFBPSU5UREUAAAACAQkQAQAAAJQA
> AACQAAAA8gAAAExaRnXBxqq3/wAKAQ8CFQKoBesCgwBQAvIJAgBjaArAc2V0MjcGAAbDAoMyA8UC
> AHByQnER4nN0ZW0CgzP3AuQHEwKAfQqACM8J2QKABwqBDbELYG5nMTAzTwBQCwoUUQvxIHUAgHUC
> YgTyYmUgcnJABGFrA2BuLnRvcORwbwuAdC4NsAqFFTECABwQAwAQEAAAAAADABEQAAAAAEAABzAg
> 7eHuj7e6AUAACDAg7eHuj7e6AR4APQABAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAhYg==
>
> ------ =_NextPart_000_01BAB798.6D9FA140--
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of SAMBA Digest 747
> ***********************
>
Our configuration is at the moment:
3 * AIX 3.2.5 (RS6000) with samba 1.9.15p2
some WfWg 3.11
I cannot get browsing or even master browsing to work.
I can get the list of shared devices when typing \\server
(Clients are all WfWg)
But even nmblookup -M -S -d3 cannot find the mashine it
runs on as master browser.
What can an expert read out of this result?
; ============================================================================
Netmask for tr2 = 255.255.255.0
Derived broadcast address 131.220.13.255
Using broadcast 131.220.13.255
bind succeeded on port 0
Socket opened.
Sending queries to 131.220.13.255
; ============================================================================
nmbd and smbd are started via inetd, just with option -d1.
user nobody and guest exists, but a passwdord is needed to login.
Here4s me global section of smb.conf
; Configuration file for smbd.
; ============================================================================
[global]
printing = bsd
printcap name = /usr/alle/samba/lib/printcap.%h
load printers = yes
guest account = nobody
workgroup = LANGROUP
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
allow hosts = 131.220.44., 131.220.88., 131.220.92., 131.220.13.
read raw = no
read size = 8192
log file = /tmp/samba_log.%m
; You will need a world readable lock directory and "share modes=yes"
; if you want to support the file sharing modes for multiple users
; of the same files
lock directory = /tmp/samba.lck
share modes = yes
auto services = homes
debug level = 0
os level = 3
username map = /usr/alle/samba/lib/username.map
; ============================================================================
Does anybody has an idea?
--
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Knut Schlecht
Institut fuer Tel.: 0228/73-2263
Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie FAX: 0228/73-2551
der Universitaet Bonn e-mail: k...@uni-bonn.de
Wegelerstr. 12
D-53115 Bonn
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 16:26:13 -0200
From: Carlos Carvalho < car...@snfep1.if.usp.br>
To: sa...@anu.edu.au
Subject: weird problem with a particular printer
Message-ID: <199511221826.QAA10...@snfep1.if.usp.br>
I have a bunch of PC's served by a linux box running 1.8.05 and it works
very fine. Now I'm changing the hardware of the server, and I copied
the samba installation. Everything still works fine except for one
thing: smbd doesn't see one of the printers!!!
Here's the relevant part of the output of testparm:
Service parameters [laser]:
comment: HP Laserjet IIIP
path: /var/spool/samba
username: laser
create mask: 0700
print ok: Yes
printer: laser
Service parameters [matricial]:
comment:
path: /var/spool/samba
username: matricial
create mask: 0700
print ok: Yes
printer: matricial
Here's the output of smbclient '\\afrodite\matricial' -P :
Server time is Wed Nov 22 14:48:50 1995
Timezone is UTC-3
Password:
smb: \>
This is fine. However, smbclient '\\afrodite\lp' -P produces:
Server time is Wed Nov 22 14:48:14 1995
Timezone is UTC-3
Password:
first SMBtcon failed, trying again. ERRSRV - ERRinvnetname (Invalid network name
in tree connect.)
SMBtcon failed. ERRSRV - ERRinvnetname (Invalid network name in tree connect.)
Perhaps you are using the wrong sharename, username or password?
The problem is that it doesn't see the lp printer. Here's the part of
/etc/printcap:
# HP Laser jet plus
laser|hplj|HP Laserjet IIIP:\
:lp=/dev/lp2:\
:sd=/var/spool/lpd/laser:\
:mx#0:\
:sh:sf:\
:lf=/var/spool/lpd/laser/erros:
lp|matricial|Epson Action Printer:\
:lp=/dev/lp1:\
:sd=/var/spool/lpd/lp:\
:mx#0:\
:sh:sf:\
:lf=/var/spool/lpd/lp/erros:
You see that lp is a sinonym for matricial!!! Here's the output of lpc stat:
laser:
queuing is enabled
printing is enabled
no entries
no daemon present
lp:
queuing is enabled
printing is enabled
no entries
no daemon present
This shows that lpd sees it. Here's part of a log at debug level 3:
switch message SMBsesssetupX
sesssetupX:name=[CARLOS]
adding home directory carlos at /home/carlos
uid 9006 registered to name carlos
size=41
smb_com=0x73
[omitted]
..
checking for home directory lp gave /var/spool/lpd
adding home directory lp at /var/spool/lpd
11/22/95 14:55:51 error packet at line 118 cmd=112 (SMBtcon) eclass=2 ecode=6
size=35
Why is it seeing /var/spool/lpd instead of /var/spool/lpd/lp as in the
printcap? The lp directory does exist, and printing from linux works
fine.
This is driving me nuts :-(
Carlos
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 95 14:25:47 EST
From: Rob A Elkins < elkin...@prism.es.dupont.com>
To: sa...@anugpo.anu.edu.au
Subject: Browsing Woes
Message-ID: <9511221925.AA06...@kraken.es.dupont.com>
Hi,
I've been working with Samba 1.9.14 and have noticed something very strange
about browsing. It appears to me that a client can only see the samba server
in a particular workgroup if it is a member of that workgroup. For instance,
if the server is broadcasting itself on a particular subnet in group GROUPA
and a particular client is on the same subnet in group GROUPB, then for some
reason, the client isn't seeing the samba server in the browse list for
GROUPA, but does if it is also in GROUPA. The server does appear in
the correct workgroup instantly if the server name is manually entered, a la
\\SERVER
Is this the way it is supposed to work, or can I expect to be able to have
the server appear in the browselist for the workgroup, even though the client
isn't a member of that particular group. BTW, there is a master browser for
the other workgroup, and you see the master browser listed in the browse list
for the other workgroup even though the server isn't being listed.
Thanks
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Just remember, no matter where you go, there you are."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Elkins Internet: elkin...@prism.es.dupont.com
DuPont Central Research & Development
Scientific Computing Division Voice: 302-695-9292
Standard Disclaimer: I'm an adult, these are my opinions, not DuPont's.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Making Better Things For Better Living, Since 1802
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 95 14:23:20 MST
From: d...@watson.den.mmc.com (David A Rageth)
To: sa...@anugpo.anu.edu.au
Subject: Version of samba for BSDI 2.0
Message-ID: <9511222123.AA04...@watson.den.mmc.com>
Samba Users:
Which version of samba compiles with BSDI 2.0 I just pulled down the
latest copy samba-1.9.15p3 and am getting compiler errors when compiling
util.c. The error I am getting is:
astns: {94} % make all
Using CFLAGS = -O -DSMBLOGFILE="/usr/local/samba/var/log.smb"
-DNMBLOGFILE="/usr/local/samba/var/log.nmb"
-DCONFIGFILE="/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf"
-DLMHOSTSFILE="/usr/local/samba/lib/lmhosts"
-DLOCKDIR="/usr/local/samba/var/locks"
-DSMBRUN="/usr/local/samba/bin/smbrun" -DWORKGROUP="WORKGROUP"
-DGUEST_ACCOUNT="nobody" -DBSDI
Using LIBS =
Compiling util.c
gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
*** Error code 1
Stop.
It is similar with cc. Any ideas?
Dave Rageth
x++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++x
x David Rageth x
x Internet : rag...@mmc.com x
x voice : (303)977-4584 x
x fax : (303) 971-1259 x
x USMail : Lockheed Martin x
x P.O. Box 179 m/s 1084 x
x Denver, Colorado x
x 80201 x
x++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++x
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 1995 09:32:05 +1100
From: "Andrew.Tridgell" < tri...@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
To: Dave_H...@qsp.co.uk
Subject: Re: How to temp Disable a Share ?
Message-ID: <199511222232.JAA15...@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
> Does anyone know of a nice 'clean' way to disable a single share
> for a short period ?
Try "available = no"
you might also like to add "browsable = no"
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 95 15:42:24 -0800
From: Otto A Gygax < o...@rumba.ece.orst.edu>
To: sa...@anugpo.anu.edu.au
Subject: samba under NEXTSTEP 3.3
Message-ID: <9511222342.AA09...@rumba.ece.orst.edu>
Hello folks,
please excuse my question if it's been around before; I just joined the list
and would like to know if anyone has built samba under NS3.3?
My build has compiled after flooding my screen with all sorts of warnings but
ld broke. It flatly refused to do anything after displaying:
Linking smbd
ld: unknown flag: -NEXTSTEP-deployment-target
*** Exit 1
Stop.
where did this come from? Is it that the binaries have no clue as to what
architecture this should run on? Any quick fix suggestions? Will greatly
appreciate any info.
---
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Otto Gygax, System Administrator/Instructor | Internet E-mail: (NeXTMail/MIME)
Oregon State University | o...@ece.orst.edu
Electrical and Computer Engineering | o...@urubamba.ece.orst.edu (home)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 16:13:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Tim Leamy < tcle...@ucdavis.edu>
To: sa...@anugpo.anu.edu.au
Subject: Samba and domain logon validations
Message-ID: < Pine.SOL.3.91.951122161318.7036K-100...@boris.ucdavis.edu>
Hello all,
Does anyone know if there is any work being done to make samba do Lan
Manager/NT domain logon validations? I would like to use logon
validation to not let users on Win95 clients unless they are validated by
samba. Thanks.
Tim Leamy
Information Resources
University of California at Davis
tcle...@ucdavis.edu
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 1995 08:33:29 +0800 (WST)
From: Tim Villa - ECS < t...@ecel.uwa.edu.au>
To: sa...@anu.edu.au
Subject: Re: re-connect from Windows 95
Message-ID: <199511230033.IAA21...@kroner.ecel.uwa.edu.au>
> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 11:26:39 +1000
> From: David Gardiner < david.gardi...@unisa.edu.au>
> To: sa...@anu.edu.au
> Subject: re-connect from Windows 95
> Message-ID: <2.2b7.32.19951122012639.002cc...@netspot.city.unisa.edu.au>
>
> My boss noticed that now when he boots Windows 95, it
> doesn't reconnect to a couple of shares on our Samba
> server - the password is invalid. If he disconnects
> and reconnects, it is fine.
>
> He used to have no problems under 1.9.14.
> The problem happened sometime between 1.9.14 and the latest
> 1.9.15p2
>
I've not seen this problem myself but it could be something to do with
your WINS. Just to check, in lib/smb.con in the [global] section have
a look at your 'password server' and 'security' settings to see which
machine the user is authenticating against.
I believe his Win95 is trying to reconnect to the other shares using the
password for the first share that it mounts. It's strange that he is not
being prompted for the correct password after the mount failure however.
Tim
--
Tim Villa Faculties of Economics & Commerce, Education and Law
Network/Systems officer The University of Western Australia _-@
Phone: +61-9-380-1796 Fax: +61-9-380-1068 --\ \,)
email: t...@ecel.uwa.edu.au http://www.ecel.uwa.edu.au/tim (*)'~(*)
------------------------------
End of SAMBA Digest 749
***********************