Kevin Padrick Complaint
By Summit 1031 Kevin Padrick Complaint [ http://www.complaintsboard.com/panel.php?action=profile&id=192084 ]
July 11, 2009
Company information:
Obsidian Finance Group, LLC
Bend, Oregon
United States
www.obsidianfinance.com
I have been dealing with a lawyer, Kevin Padrick, who knowingly took advantage
of a business, Summit Accommodators, Inc. dba Summit 1031 Exchange, that was having
liquidity problems by selling himself and his companies, Obsidian Finance Group,
LLC, services to them. He told them his company would help facilitate 1031 exchanges,
fund the exchanges, and liquidate the assets for top dollar to earn their high hourly
rates and 15% commission. The shareholders of the company were not familiar with
bankruptcy law because their company was not in danger of bankruptcy for the last
15 years. It was only when the real estate market collapsed that they found themselves
with a liquidity problem. They couldn't get temporary loans, the could liquidate
property, they couldn't get paid back on loans owed to them. However, when they
declared bankruptcy, they still had $13.6 Million in the bank account. Kevin Padrick,
Senior Principal of Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, saw the cash in the bank and decided
that a few million of the cash should be his. Instead of helping the debtor facilitate
the exchanges and liquidate the assets, he and his company did nothing except stall
and go to the other side (creditors' committee) with priviledged information (debtor's
gave him) claiming he had done all the research and somehow convinced them to give
him the job as Chief Restructuring Officer. Originally, this was a bankruptcy that
was a debtor in possession with a Chief Restructuring Officer (CRO) in charge of
the restructuring efforts. Obsidian Finance was supposed to be working for the CRO.
Obsidian Finance or Padrick did not communicate with the CRO or the debtors. Instead,
they communicated with the creditors. All of a sudden, the Court said their needed
to be a trustee and Kevin Padrick was appointed as bankruptcy or liquidating trustee.
The CRO had already figured out there was no Ponzi scheme and he was doing his job
working with all the parties and liquidating properties. He approved $750K of sales
before he was dismissed. Obsidian Finance & Kevin Padrick charged the bankruptcy
estate $184K to get their Senior Principal the job of Bankruptcy Trustee. Then simply
by transferring the remaining cash (cash not distributed to creditors) OR $6 Million,
Kevin Padrick charged the estate 3% or approximately $1/2 Milllion for a simple
bank transfer & money in checking when he got the job. Then Kevin Padrick hired
legal counsel, Tonkon Torp, to harass innocent people until they run out of money
and energy and give up their interest in properties where they put their hard earned
money in and have every right to still own that interest. Tonkon Torp is charging
the estate $270K of which most is for services that bring no benefit to the creditors,
but hike up their hours and legal fees earned. The more time they waste, the more
money they are able to charge. Total charges between these 3 entities is almost
$1 Million in just 5 months. The only amount of money they have brought into the
estate is $10K. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 330 of the United States Chapter 11
bankruptcy code, (3) in determining the amount of reasonable compensation to be
awarded to a Trustee or professional person, the Court shall consider the nature,
the extent, and the value of such services, taking into account all relevant factors,
including...
(A) time spent on such services (Who gets paid $184K to land a job)
(B) the rates charged for such services (Kevin Padrick's rate is $600/hour and all
he does for the hourly rate is waste time, allege things without proof, and harass
innocent people until they throw up their hands and give them their property)
(C) whether the services were necessary to the administration of, or beneficial
at the time at when the service was rendered. (Who gets $164K to transfer money
from one bank account to another???? The remaining is simply 3% of what was in the
Summit 1031's bank account when Kevin Padrick took over the job as Trustee)
(D) whether the services were performed within a reasonable amount of time commensurate
with the complexity, importance, and nature of the problem, issue, or task addressed
(Kevin Padrick makes it look like it is more complex than it is, he does nothing
to make things move quickly, he ignores and loses offers on properties ($900K worth
so far), and he has caused the majority of the delays in this case)
(E) with respect to a professional person, whether the person is board certified
(Kevin Padrick is an attorney so he does fit this part of the code)
(F) whether the compensation is reasonable based on the customary compensation charged
by comparably skilled practitioners (The attorneys are trying to finish the 1031
exchanges and the estate is paying for their learning curve...The attorneys have
charged $125K more than a Qualified Intermediary would charge for the same work)
(4) (A) The Court shall not allow compensation for...
(i) unnecessary duplication of services (I identified almost 200K is for duplication
of services)
(ii) (I) services that are not reasonably likely to benefit the debtor's estate
(Kevin Padrick knows this is not a Ponzi scheme and there was not any Embezzlement,
but he is trying to use this to drum up claims against innocent third parties. The
fees that have been charged to go after innocent third parties is $111K. By the
time everyone figures out there was no Ponzi Scheme or Embezzlement, Kevin Padrick
will be $6Million dollars richer and on his way to benefit from someone else's misfortune.
He has only netted the estate $3K, but has charged the estate almost $1Million.
How is this benefitting the creditors? It seems that it is mostly profitable to
Kevin Padrick, Obsidian, and Tonkon Torp for providing absolutely no value to the
estate)
(ii)(II) necessary to the administration of the cased (This if for the Court and/or
US Trustees Office to determine)
On 7/2/09, I filed an objection to these fees. To view this objection, go to http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=1196.
There is also a taping of Kevin Padrick & Obsidian Finance's presentation to interested
parties and shareholders included on this site at http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=254.
At this presentation Kevin Padrick does not want us to take notes, does not tell
us who sent him to the creditors' committee, and does not tell us how he is going
to bring value to the estate. From this presentation, it is difficult to tell what
type of professional competence would warrant costing the estate $1 Million in Attorney
and Professional Fees.
http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/legal-amp-liquidation-services-bend-oregon-c225684.html
Copyright 2009 http://www.complaintsboard.com