Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!axiom!adelie!ll-xn!topaz!rubin From: ru...@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Mike Rubin) Newsgroups: net.bugs.uucp Subject: ULTRIX uucp vs. 4.3bsd (and others) Message-ID: <4938@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> Date: Fri, 9-May-86 12:01:00 EDT Article-I.D.: topaz.4938 Posted: Fri May 9 12:01:00 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 11-May-86 00:29:52 EDT Distribution: net Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 8 Keywords: parity It seems that ULTRIX uucp defaults to "send even parity and accept ONLY EVEN PARITY". This makes it unable to converse with various other systems, including (it seems) 4.3bsd. The fix: you must put the magic cookie "P_ZERO" in your send-expect sequence, e.g. foovax Any ACU 1200 5551212 "" P_ZERO .... --Mike Rubin Timeplex, Inc. {topaz, philabs!wu1}!timeplex!mrubin
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!seismo!rochester!kodak!ektools!ken From: k...@ektools.UUCP (Kenneth J. Lester) Newsgroups: net.bugs.uucp Subject: Re: ULTRIX uucp vs. 4.3bsd (and others) Message-ID: <391@ektools.UUCP> Date: Mon, 12-May-86 16:31:33 EDT Article-I.D.: ektools.391 Posted: Mon May 12 16:31:33 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 15-May-86 06:40:36 EDT References: <4938@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> Reply-To: k...@ektools.UUCP (Kenneth J. Lester) Distribution: net Organization: Eastman Kodak, Dept. 47 Lines: 30 Keywords: parity In article <4...@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> ru...@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Mike Rubin) writes: > >It seems that ULTRIX uucp defaults to "send even parity and accept >ONLY EVEN PARITY". This makes it unable to converse with various >other systems, including (it seems) 4.3bsd. The fix: you must put >the magic cookie "P_ZERO" in your send-expect sequence, e.g. > foovax Any ACU 1200 5551212 "" P_ZERO .... > >--Mike Rubin Timeplex, Inc. {topaz, philabs!wu1}!timeplex!mrubin We were using Ultrix-32 1.1 on a VAX 750, and have made uucp connections to various unix machines (Version 7, Sun 2.2, and System 5.2) without running into any parity problems. A week ago we upgrade to Ultrix-32 1.2 and it didn't break any of our uucp connections. We do not use P_ZERO in our send-expect sequence. In fact the uucp installation and administration manual for both versions state that P_ZERO is the default. It would be helpful if you stated the exact version of Ultrix that is causing this difficulty. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ken Lester System Administrator, Software Tools Laboratory Product Software Engineering USPS: EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, 901 Elmgrove Rd., Rochester, NY 14650 VOICE: 716 726-0322 UUCP: {allegra, seismo}!rochester!kodak!ektools!ken ARPA: kodak!ektools!...@rochester.ARPA
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!husc6! harvard!topaz!rubin From: ru...@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Mike Rubin) Newsgroups: net.bugs.uucp Subject: Re: ULTRIX uucp vs. 4.3bsd (and others) Message-ID: <4971@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> Date: Thu, 15-May-86 19:44:47 EDT Article-I.D.: topaz.4971 Posted: Thu May 15 19:44:47 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 17-May-86 03:26:15 EDT References: <4938@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> <391@ektools.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 13 Keywords: parity Summary: Ultrix 1.1; it may not have been a bug > >It seems that ULTRIX uucp defaults to "send even parity and accept > >ONLY EVEN PARITY".... > > We were using Ultrix-32 1.1 on a VAX 750, and have made uucp connections to > various unix machines (Version 7, Sun 2.2, and System 5.2) without running > into any parity problems.... [and Ultrix 1.2 also works] We're also running Ultrix-32 1.1 on a VAX-750; from the replies on the net I am beginning to suspect our modems (Microcom's) are munging something although I told them to use 8 bits, no parity. Oh well. Wasn't there traffic on the net a while back describing some uucp problem between Ultrix and 4.3? --Mike Rubin {topaz, philabs!wu1}!timeplex!mrubin
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!seismo!decuac!avolio From: avo...@decuac.DEC.COM (Frederick M. Avolio) Newsgroups: net.bugs.uucp Subject: Re: ULTRIX uucp vs. 4.3bsd (and others) Message-ID: <936@decuac.DEC.COM> Date: Wed, 21-May-86 23:53:59 EDT Article-I.D.: decuac.936 Posted: Wed May 21 23:53:59 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 24-May-86 04:25:43 EDT References: <4938@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> <391@ektools.UUCP> <4971@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> Distribution: net Organization: ULTRIX Applications Center, MD Lines: 18 Keywords: parity In article <4...@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>, ru...@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Mike Rubin) writes: > We're also running Ultrix-32 1.1 on a VAX-750; from the replies on the > net I am beginning to suspect our modems (Microcom's) are munging something > ... Wasn't there traffic on the net a while back describing some uucp problem > between Ultrix and 4.3? Look, for the record... We run Ultrix-32 V1.2. We ran V1.1 and V1.0. Ran all the field test versions in between. We talk to System V systems, 4.2BSD systems, 4.1C systems, V7 systems, 4.3 systems, and System III systems. We talk to Goulds, Pyramids, other VAXes, Wicats (at a time), and a 3B-something. We don't have problems with UUCP to any of them. The same can be said for DECVAX, a usenet backbone site. Why DECVAX even talks to european systems! :-) -- Fred @ DEC Ultrix Applications Center INET: avo...@decuac.DEC.COM * Fight the Fight * UUCP: {decvax,seismo,cbosgd}!decuac!avolio * Rescue the Unborn *