Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!
rutgers!njin!princeton!njsmu!mccc!pjh
From: p...@mccc.UUCP (Pete Holsberg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: 3B2/300 vs 310
Message-ID: <159@mccc.UUCP>
Date: 24 Sep 88 19:11:18 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: Mercer County Community College, Trenton, New Jersey 08690
Lines: 10


Briefly, what are the differences between the 3B2/300 and the 3B2/310?

Thanks.

Pete Holsberg                   UUCP: {...!rutgers!}princeton!mccc!pjh
Technology Division                   ...!att!jonlab!mccc!pjh
Mercer College			CompuServe: 70240,334
1200 Old Trenton Road           GEnie: PJHOLSBERG
Trenton, NJ 08690               Voice: 1-609-586-4800

Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!scott
From: sc...@attcan.UUCP (Scott MacQuarrie)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: 3B2/300 vs 310
Summary: Just the facts...:-)
Message-ID: <3424@vpk4.UUCP>
Date: 27 Sep 88 14:31:20 GMT
References: <159@mccc.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Canada Inc., Toronto
Lines: 33

In article <1...@mccc.UUCP>, p...@mccc.UUCP (Pete Holsberg) writes:
> 
> Briefly, what are the differences between the 3B2/300 and the 3B2/310?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Pete Holsberg                   UUCP: {...!rutgers!}princeton!mccc!pjh
> Technology Division                   ...!att!jonlab!mccc!pjh
> Mercer College			CompuServe: 70240,334
> 1200 Old Trenton Road           GEnie: PJHOLSBERG
> Trenton, NJ 08690               Voice: 1-609-586-4800

The difference is very simple. The first thing is the 3B2/310 is a 
direct replacement of the 3B2/300. They look exactly the same from a 
physical perspective. The much more important difference is the CPU on 
the 300 is an older verion. The 3B2/310 has a WE32100 CPU (That's Western
Electric). This is an upgraded version of the earlier model and is running
at a faster clock rate ( 10 Mhz ). There is an upgrade available for 300 to
allow you to improve to a 3B2/310.

I have a converted 3B2/300 as one of my home machines, so the process is quite
simple to do. My system is now a 3B2/310 running at the 10 Mhz. You may find
it difficult to aquire the upgrade kit in the future, since the 3B2/300 is a 
discontinued model, so if you have one of there beasties I would recommend
upgrading as soon as you can.

Scott MacQuarrie
Sr. Technical Consultant
AT&T Canada Inc.
uunet!attcan!scott

p.s. My own opinions..of course

Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!pyrdc!netsys!len
From: l...@netsys.COM (Len Rose)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: 3B2/300 vs 310
Summary: 3.1 Unix didn't work
Message-ID: <10459@netsys.COM>
Date: 30 Sep 88 15:21:36 GMT
References: <159@mccc.UUCP> <363@occrsh.ATT.COM> <8721@watdragon.waterloo.edu> 
<8768@watdragon.waterloo.edu>
Reply-To: l...@netsys.COM (Len Rose)
Distribution: na
Organization: Netsys,Inc.
Lines: 7

Speaking from practical experience I was not able to boot 3.1 on
a 3B2/300 here. It would load fine,but after a few minutes into
system initialization it would hang..


Len Rose - Netsys,Inc. 
l...@ames.arc.nasa.gov  or l...@netsys.com

Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!convex!killer!ames!mailrus!uflorida!gatech!
ulysses!hector!ekrell
From: ekr...@hector.UUCP (Eduardo Krell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: 3B2/300 vs 310
Message-ID: <10674@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Date: 30 Sep 88 22:37:45 GMT
References: <159@mccc.UUCP> <363@occrsh.ATT.COM> <8721@watdragon.waterloo.edu> 
<8768@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <10459@netsys.COM>
Sender: netn...@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com
Reply-To: ekr...@hector.UUCP (Eduardo Krell)
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 9

In article <10...@netsys.COM> l...@netsys.COM (Len Rose) writes:
>Speaking from practical experience I was not able to boot 3.1 on
>a 3B2/300 here.

I've had no problem on my 300 with 3.0 or 3.1 or later minor versions.
    
Eduardo Krell                   AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ

UUCP: {att,decvax,ucbvax}!ulysses!ekrell  Internet: ekr...@ulysses.att.com

Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!convex!killer!tness7!swbatl!amyerg!root
From: r...@amyerg.UUCP (Admin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: 3B2/300 vs 310
Summary: Works here.
Message-ID: <417@amyerg.UUCP>
Date: 1 Oct 88 01:28:16 GMT
References: <159@mccc.UUCP> <363@occrsh.ATT.COM> <8721@watdragon.waterloo.edu> 
<10459@netsys.COM>
Distribution: na
Organization: MS Dept. of Corrections
Lines: 20

In article <10...@netsys.COM>, l...@netsys.COM (Len Rose) writes:
-> Speaking from practical experience I was not able to boot 3.1 on
-> a 3B2/300 here. It would load fine,but after a few minutes into
-> system initialization it would hang..

Funny, I've had 3.1 up and running here on my 3b2/300 for two months.
Perhaps I can give you some hints?

BTW, can I run 3.2.1 on a 3b2/300, and how much would it cost me to
upgrade?

> Len Rose - Netsys,Inc. 
> l...@ames.arc.nasa.gov  or l...@netsys.com


-- 
Ewan Grantham (601) 354-6454 ext. 412  Miss. Dept. of Corrections
{}!swbatl!amyerg!egranthm             (The Prison People)
My bosses aren't responsible for me, and vice versa
Go New Orleans Saints!!!