Path: gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rice!sun-spots-request From: da...@imax.com (Dave Martindale) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Partitions, GNU tar, and dump Keywords: Software Message-ID: <10109@brazos.Rice.edu> Date: 19 Jul 90 15:50:37 GMT Sender: ro...@rice.edu Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 9 Approved: Sun-...@rice.edu Posted: Thu Jul 19 16:50:37 1990 X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 9, Issue 273, message 11 Originator: sp...@titan.rice.edu In a previous message, I stated that dump was still necessary because GNU tar could not do incremental dumps. As several people have pointed out, GNU tar *does* do incremental dumps. I must plead guilty to temporary insanity. I had confused the public domain tar written by John Gilmore <g...@toad.com> (which I use), with the genuine GNU tar. Sorry about misleading people. Dave Martindale
Path: gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!snorkelwacker!usc!cs.utexas.edu!rice! sun-spots-request From: gl...@csri.toronto.edu (Glenn Mackintosh) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Re: Partitions, GNU tar, and dump Keywords: Software Message-ID: < 10163@brazos.Rice.edu> Date: 23 Jul 90 19:57:46 GMT Sender: ro...@rice.edu Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 21 Approved: Sun-...@rice.edu Posted: Mon Jul 23 20:57:46 1990 X-Refs: Original: v9n273 X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 9, Issue 278, message 1 Originator: sp...@titan.rice.edu da...@imax.com (Dave Martindale) writes: >In a previous message, I stated that dump was still necessary because GNU >tar could not do incremental dumps. As several people have pointed out, >GNU tar *does* do incremental dumps. I must plead guilty to temporary >insanity. I had confused the public domain tar written by John Gilmore >< g...@toad.com> (which I use), with the genuine GNU tar. However, tar does have the problem that it fills in holes in files. This means that databses that fit on your disk but contain chunks that don't actually have blocks assigned to them suddenly get much bigger, perhaps even too big for your disk if the holes are very big, if you try and recover it from a tar'ed tape. Glenn Mackintosh Univ. of Toronto CSNET/ARPA: glenn@eecg.{toronto.edu,utoronto.ca} CDNNET: glenn@eecg.toronto.cdn BITNET: glenn@eecg.utoronto.bitnet (may not work from all sites) UUCP: uunet!utai!eecg!glenn
Path: gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!lll-winken!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!rice! sun-spots-request From: alpe...@volcano.Berkeley.EDU (Al Petrofsky) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun Subject: Re: Partitions, GNU tar, and dump Keywords: Software Message-ID: < 1990Aug9.021608.5916@rice.edu> Date: 6 Aug 90 22:17:23 GMT Sender: sun-spot...@rice.edu Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 13 Approved: Sun-...@rice.edu Posted: Mon Aug 6 23:17:23 1990 Originator: sp...@titan.rice.edu X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 9, Issue 289, message 20 In article < 10...@brazos.Rice.edu> gl...@csri.toronto.edu (Glenn Mackintosh) writes: However, tar does have the problem that it fills in holes in files. This means that databses that fit on your disk but contain chunks that don't actually have blocks assigned to them suddenly get much bigger, perhaps even too big for your disk if the holes are very big, if you try and recover it from a tar'ed tape. The June 1990 GNUS Bulletin says GNU tar includes "the ability to archive sparse files." I haven't tried it, but it sounds like they've got all the bases covered. Al Petrofsky alpe...@ocf.berkeley.edu